和“神鬼”讲逻辑

精品文摘 No Comments »

昏天黑地的开了两天的项目会。团结而胜利的大会之后,同志们欢喜的各回各处之前,年轻的人们开始放松的聊着小天,沟通感情。聊到兴起之处,那种感觉恍惚又回到了大学男生宿舍。呵呵,话题毫不出意外的,又从这个项目,就谈到到了战争、宇宙、人类和神鬼的高度。

你信有神鬼吗?我相信这个世界有些自然现象是人们还没有足够知识去解释的。有人用“神鬼”具化它,有人把它叫做“未知领域”。我分享了一个我读大学时的故事。

大一的时候,我听一位关系很好的贵州的同学说,他们那里流行用某种方法与神鬼接触。当时没有互联网,好奇心极度旺盛的我就求着他无论如何要给我看。横不过我,终于半年后的一个晚上,他告诉我“东西都准备好了。你准备好了吗?”。

我们要请的,叫做“碟仙”。

之后的一两年,我每次告诉身边的人我的这段经历的时候,没有人相信,很郁闷。大家用惋惜的眼光看着我,我知道他们忍住没说“看你挺聪明的,想不到也会被这些把戏愚弄”。后来我就不和人争辩了,我自己的逻辑都还没有理清楚的时候,我怎么可以要求别人改变他的逻辑呢?

那个碟子,以某种方式动了。我拿了一副扑克牌倒扣在桌上,用我的逻辑,问了碟仙三个问题。

  1. 我抽了一张牌,自己小心的看了一眼,然后把牌倒扣在桌上,问:“碟仙,请你告诉我,刚才我抽出来的那张牌是什么?”
  2. 我又抽了一张,这次我看都没看,直接倒扣在桌面上。就问:“碟仙,请你告诉我,我这次抽出来的牌是什么?”
  3. 第三次,我直接问:“碟仙,我马上会再抽一张牌,在我抽之前,请先告诉我这张牌将会是什么?”

第一个问题是想了解,“碟仙”知不知道已经发生,而且我知道的事情。第二个问题是想了解,“碟仙”知不知道已经发生,但是我不知道的事情。第三个问题是想了解,“碟仙”知不知道还没有发生的事情。

我的面前有三张牌倒扣着,“碟仙”用它的方式回答了每一个问题,我得到了三个答案。你猜结果如何?

如果你猜它全都答对了,你就错了;你猜它其实什么都不知道,也不是。他答对了第一个问题,而答错了后两个。也就是说,他知道我知道的,但是不知道我不知道的,更不知道未来。

网上有很多关于“碟仙”的讨论,我知道的还太少。但用这个逻辑我至少知道了,“碟仙”并不无所不知,更不可预知未来,我于是觉得安全很多。:-)

和“神鬼”都能讲逻辑,和人,难道不行吗?

One way to dramatically lower customer complaints

精品文摘 No Comments »

A florist dropped off a few dozen flowers at my house. The card had our name on it, but nothing was printed, there was no way to tell which florist brought them by.

I can just see the discussion at headquarters. “We’ve been getting way too many customer complaints. People get the flowers and they’re not happy with them, so they call and want a refund or replacement. It takes a lot of time and hassle.”

“I know! Let’s just take our name and phone number off the card.”

Sort of like having heavier than usual call volume, or hiding your contact info somewhere deep on your website.

How to Get the Attention of a Venture Capitalist

精品文摘 No Comments »
iStock_000002519960Small.jpg

At the Elite Retreat I gave an off-the-cuff answer to a question concerning getting the attention of venture capitalists. My buddy Wendy Piersall blogged about my answer, and it was a very popular. However, to truly help entrepreneurs, I’d like to provide a cogent list of the tips to get the attention of a venture capitalist.

  1. Get an introduction by a partner-level lawyer. He should work at a firm that does a lot of venture capital financings like my buddies at Montgomery & Hansen. Best case email/voicemail: “This is the most interesting company I’ve seen in my twenty years of legal work for startups.” Venture capitalists dream about calls like this—it’s the equivalent of a scoring shot that knocks the goalie’s water bottle off the top shelf.

    Incidentally, this part of the reason of why you should pay top dollar and use a well-known corporate finance attorney instead of Uncle Joe the divorce lawyer (even if he handles venture capitalists’ divorces). You’re paying for connections not only expertise.

  2. Get an introduction by a professor of engineering. Best case email/voicemail: “These students are the smartest ones I’ve ever had in twenty years of teaching computer science. Larry and Sergei would have carried their backpacks for them.” Arguably this is even better than the lawyer’s call if the school has a history of receiving multi-million dollar donations from its alumni—if you know what I mean.

  3. Get an introduction by the founder of a company in the venture capitalist’s portfolio. Best case email/voicemail: “My buddies are starting a new company, and I think it’s really cool.” For this to work, it would help if the person making the call is a successful company in the venture capitalist’s portfolio. Also, this would be a good time to tap your network in LinkedIn to find acquaintances in the portfolio.

    Here’s a power tip regarding getting to venture capitalists using LinkedIn. Maybe it’s only me, but I hate when a connection of a connection of a connection wants me to take a look at deal. LinkedIn enables you to just go direct, and that’s my advice if you can show success (see below). If you can’t show success, the connection of a connection of a connection is useless anyway.

  4. Show success. Suppose you can’t get any of the introductions mentioned above. Then the most compelling email/voicemail that you provide is this: “My buddy and I have been working in our garage, taking no pay, and with MySQL we built a site that is doubling in traffic every month. Right now, we’re at 250,000 page views a day after thirty days.” With this one sentence you’ve proven you can (a) make a little bit of money (“none”) go far, your architecture looks scalable so far (once in my career I’d like scalability to be a problem), and most importantly, the dogs are already eating the food.

    Another way to show success is to hit it out of the park at Demo or the poor man’s Demo we call Launch: Silicon Valley, but this is a game that only a few dozen companies can play in every year. Finally, you can provide links to articles singing your praises, but this only means that you fooled the press, not that the dogs like what you’re serving.

  5. Make sure your company is in the right space. No matter how you get to the venture capitalist, make sure that she is the right one for you. For example, if you have the cure for cancer, contacting a firm’s enterprise software guru isn’t the brightest idea, so get on the web and do your homework.

  6. Use a short email. The ideal length of your email is three or fourth paragraphs:

    • What does your company do?

    • What problem are you solving?

    • What’s special about your technology/marketing/expertise/connections?

    • Who are you?

    Here are some things not to do:

    • Attach a PowerPoint presentation. I don’t care if it even adheres to the 10/20/30 rule. Save it for the face-to-face meeting.

    • Use the word “patented” more than once. All it takes to file a patent is $1,000. No good venture capitalist believes patents makes your company defensible. They just want to learn (once) that there might be something worth patenting.

    • Claim that you’re in a multi-billion dollar market. Isn’t every company in a multi-billion market according to some study? At least every company that’s ever pitched a venture capitalist.

    • Provide a lofty financial projection. Most projections that I see show how you’ll grow faster than Google. Frankly, I wouldn’t provide any projection at all. It will be either too low and make your deal uninteresting or too high and make you look delusional.

    • Brag about an MBA degree. Most venture capitalists want to invest in hardcore engineers at the start. The MBAs can come later, so focus on engineering or avoid the subject completely.

    • Try to create the illusion of scarcity. Many entrepreneurs claim that “Sequoia is interested.” If Sequoia is interested, you should take its money. If it isn’t, then the venture capitalist won’t be either. Either way, don’t even think of blowing this smoke.

This posting is merely about the process of getting across the moat. To learn more about what to do once you’re there, read how to fix your pitch by Bill Reichert of Garage.


The Entrepreneur’s New Year’s Resolution: "I Will Fix My Pitch"

精品文摘 No Comments »
BillReichert.jpg

Here’s a New Year’s resolution for entrepreneurs:
”I will fix my pitch.“ And here’s a suggestion on how to do this written by Bill Reichert, my colleague at Garage Technology Ventures.


Endless articles, books, and blogs have been written on the topic of business plan presentations and pitching to investors. In spite of this wealth of advice, almost every entrepreneur gets it wrong. Why? Because most guides to pitching your company miss the central point: The purpose of your pitch is to sell, not to teach. Your job is to excite, not to educate.

Pitching is about understanding what your customer (the investor) is most interested in, and developing a dialog that enables you to connect with the head, the heart, and the gut of the investor. If you want advice about pitching, you can ask a venture capitalist, but you probably won’t get a very good answer. Most VCs are analytic types, and so they will give you a laundry list of topics you should cover. They won’t tell you what really “floats their boat,” mainly because they can’t articulate it in useful terms. “I know it when I see it,” is about the best answer you’ll get.

What is the investor most interested in? Contrary to popular belief, the venture capitalist sitting at the other end of the table glaring inscrutably at the presenting entrepreneur is not thinking, “Is this company going to make a lot of money?” That is the simple question that most entrepreneurs think they are answering, but they are missing the crux of the venture capital process. What the investor is really thinking is, “Is this company the best next investment for me and my fund?” That is a much more complex issue, but that is what the entrepreneur has to pitch.

So, the pitch has to accomplish three things:

  • Provide a good, clear, easy-to-repeat story—the story of an exciting new startup.

  • Fit with other investments the individual venture capitalist has made and the investments the firm is chartered to make.

  • Beat out the other investments the firm is currently considering.

These latter two issues are beyond the scope of this modest guide. So for now, let’s just concentrate on telling a good story.

Tell a Good Story

Most of the articles on pitching are generally right about the topics, even if they miss the nuance (sell, don’t explain). But don’t take any template as graven in stone. Your story may require a moderate, or even a dramatic, variation on the list of presentation slides (listed below). You may need to explain the solution before you can explain the market; or if you are in a crowded space, you may need to explain why you are different than everyone else early on in the conversation; or you may want to drop some very impressive brand-name customers before you explain your product or your market. The one thing you may not do is expand the number of slides to twenty (or thirty or fifty)! Other than that, let the specifics of your situation dictate the flow of your slides.

Nevertheless, it is useful to have a guide. With the caveats above in mind, here is a basic outline for your pitch:

  • Cover Slide: Company name, location, tagline, presenter’s name and title. If there are multiple team members participating in the pitch, put names on the next slide instead. Key objective: Everyone in the room should know the basic value proposition of the company, including the target market, before the next slide is shown. All the words should not be on this slide, but reinforce and extend the tagline orally so that that everyone has a foundation for what is to come.

  • Intro Slide: Team. The three or four key players in the company. For some reason, everyone puts the team slide at the end, but investors want to know this at the beginning, and it is common courtesy to make sure everyone is introduced. But make this short, crisp and relevant. This is not the time to share everyone’s life story, or detail the resumes of all six members of the advisory board. Focus on a significant, relevant accomplishment for each person that identifies that person as a winner. In ten to fifteen seconds, you should be able to say three or four sentences about your CTO that says everything the investors want to know about him or her at that moment. Key objective: Investors should be confident that there is a good credible core group of talent that believe in the company and can execute the next set of milestones. One of those milestones may be filling out the team, and so it is important to convey that the initial team knows how to attract great talent, as well as having great domain skills. If there is a gap in the team, address it explicitly, before investors have to ask about it.

  • Slide 1: Company Overview. The best way to give an overview of your company is to state concisely your core value proposition: What unique benefit will you provide to what set of customers to address what particular need? Then you can add three or four additional dot points to clarify your target markets, your unique technology/solution, and your status (launch date, current customers, revenue rate, pipeline, funding needed). Key objective: Flesh out the foundation you established at the beginning. At this point, no one should have any question about what it is that your company does, or plans to do. The only questions that should remain are the details of how you are going to do it. Another key objective you should have achieved by this point in your presentation is to make sure that if there are some compelling brand names associated with your company (customers, partners, investors, advisors), your audience knows about them. Feel free to drop names early and often—starting with your first email introduction to the investor. Brand name relationships build your credibility, but do not overstate them if they are tenuous.

  • Slide 2: Problem/Opportunity. You need to make it clear that there is a big, important problem (current or emerging) that you are going to solve, or opportunity you are going to exploit, and that you understand the market dynamics surrounding the opportunity—why does this situation exist and persist, and why is it only now that it can be addressed? Show that you really understand the very particular market segment you are targeting, and frame your market analysis according to the specific problem and solution you are laying out. In some cases, however, the problem you are attacking is so obvious and clear that you can drop this slide altogether. You do not have to tell investors that there are a lot of cell phones out there or that teenagers like to socialize. Save yourself, and them, the pain of the obvious.

  • Slide 2.1: Problem/Opportunity Size. Even if your market opportunity is not obvious, you can assert the size of your opportunity on slide 2. Sometimes you may need a slide to clarify the factors that define the size and scope of the opportunity, particularly if you are going after multiple market segments. There may be a unique market dynamic or emerging trend that requires explanation. Do not use this slide to quote the Gartner Group or Frost & Sullivan; show that you really understand where your prospective customers are from the ground up.

  • Slide 3. Solution. What specifically are you offering to whom? Software, hardware, services, a combination? Use common terms to state concretely what you have, or what you do, that solves the problem you’ve identified. Avoid acronyms and don’t try to use these precious few words to create and trademark a bunch of terms that won’t mean anything to most people, and don’t use this as an opportunity to showcase your insider status and facility with the idiomatic lingo of the industry. If you can demonstrate your solution (briefly) in a meeting, this is the place to do it.

  • Slide 3.1. Delivering the Solution. You might need an extra slide to show how your solution fits in the value chain or ecosystem of your target market. Do you complement commonly used technologies, or do you displace them? Do you change the way certain business processes get executed, or do you just do them the same way, but faster, better and cheaper? Do you disrupt the current value chain, or do you fit into established channels? Who exactly is the buyer, and is that person different than the user?

  • Slide 4. Benefits/Value. State clearly and quantify to the extent possible the three or four key benefits you provide, and who specifically realizes these benefits. Do some constituents benefit more than others, or earlier than others? These dynamics should inform your go-to-market strategy, and your product/service roadmap, which you will discuss later.

  • Slide 5. Secret Sauce/Intellectual Property. Depending on your solution, you might need a separate slide to convince investors that no one else can easily duplicate or surpass your solution (assuming that’s actually true.) If you are in a business sector in which intellectual property is important, this is where you drill down into your secret sauce and proprietary technology. Again, boil this down to simple elements and terms, devoid of jargon. Do not walk the audience through a guided tour of your detailed product architecture. Instead, highlight the elements of your technology that give you unique potential for leverage and scale as you grow. If you do slides 4 and 5 well, it will be easy to make the case for your…

  • Slide 6. Competitive Advantage. Okay, so how are you better than everyone else, including the status quo? Most entrepreneurs misunderstand the critical objective of this slide, which is not to enumerate all the deficiencies of the competition (as much fun as that may be.) Just because you have really cool technology, secret sauce, and intellectual property does not mean you will win. Other factors like domain expertise, high-level connections, and special relationships with customers, vendors, and other companies also play a part. Your key objective is to convince the investor that lots of folks will buy your product or service, even though they have several alternatives (one of which may be to do nothing), for very good reasons.

    The best way to convince an investor is to have referenceable customers or prospects who will articulate in their own words why they bought or will buy your offering over the alternatives. Use this slide to summarize the three or four key reasons why customers prefer your solution to other solutions and to the status quo. Many entrepreneurs have been coached to use a four-square matrix that shows that they are in the upper right-hand quadrant, but this has become a joke in the venture community. Check-boxes are better, if they are not abused. Make sure your check-box criteria reflect the market’s requirements, not just your product’s features.

  • Slide 6.1. Competitive Advantage Matrix. Depending on how important the analysis of competitive players is in your market segment, you may need a matrix to provide a detailed list of competitors by category. Preferably, you develop this as a “pocket slide” to be used for Q & A, if necessary. It is important, however, that you do your homework on the competition, and that you don’t misrepresent their strengths or their weaknesses.

  • Slide 7. Go to Market Strategy. The single most compelling slide in any pitch is a pipeline of customers and strategic partners that have already expressed some interest in your solution—if they haven’t already joined your beta program. Too often this slide is, instead, a bland laundry list of standard sales and marketing tactics. You should focus on articulating the non-obvious, potentially disruptive elements of your strategy, or you can frame your comments in terms of the critical hurdles you need to get over, and how you are going to jump them. If you don’t have a pipeline, and there is nothing unique or innovative about your strategy, then drop this slide and make the elements of your sales model clear in the discussion of your business model (next slide).

  • Slide 8: Business Model. How do you make money? Usually by selling something for a certain price to certain customers. But there are lots of variations on the standard theme. Explain your pricing, your costs, and why you are going to be especially profitable. Make sure you understand the key assumptions underlying your planned success and be prepared to defend them. What if you can’t sustain the price? What if it takes twice as long to make each sale? What if your costs don’t decline over time? Some investors will want to test the depth of your understanding of your business model. Be ready to articulate the sensitivity of your business to variations in your assumptions.

  • Slide 9. Financial Projections. The two previous slides above should come together neatly in your five-year financial projections. [Bill and I disagree here. I think a five-year projection is impossible.] You should show the two or three key metrics that drive revenues, expenses and growth (such as customers, unit sales, new products, expansion sales, new markets), as well as the revenue, expense, profit, cash balance, and headcount lines. The most important thing to convey on this slide is that you really understand the economics and evolution of a growing, dynamic company, and that your vision is grounded in an understanding of practical reality. Your financials should tell your story in numbers as clearly as you are telling your story in words. Investors are not focused on the precision of your numbers; they’re focused on the coherence and integrity of your business plan.

  • Slide 10. Financing Requirements/Milestones. It should be clear from your financials what your capital requirements will be. On this slide you should outline how you plan to take in funding—how big each round will be, and the timing of each—and map the funding against your key near-term and medium-term milestones. You should also include your key achievements to date. These milestones should tie to the key metrics in your financial projections, and they should provide a clear, crisp picture of your product introduction and market expansion roadmap. In essence, this is your operating plan for the funds you are raising. Do not spend time presenting a “use of funds” table. Investors want to see measures of accomplishment, not measures of activity. And they want to know that you are asking for the right amount of money to get the company to a meaningful milestone.

  • Summary Slide. This slide is almost always wasted. Most entrepreneurs just put up three or four dot points about how wonderful their investment opportunity is. Generally the words are the same words that investors hear from scores of other entrepreneurs, such as, “We have a huge opportunity, and we will be the winners!” Your key objective on this slide is to solidify the core value proposition of your company in words that are memorable and unique to your company. If the venture investor in the room has to give a short description of your company to his partners, these are the words you want used. This is a good place to reinforce your tagline, or mantra—the short phrase that captures the essence of your message to investors. The best solution to creating your summary slide is to imagine that this is the only slide you will ever be able to present. If you had to do your whole pitch in one slide (with 30 point font), this is that slide.

So here we have a good general outline for pitching your company. But remember, it’s about selling your investment proposition, not about covering points. Don’t get fixated on using this or any other template. You should know the issues about your company that investors are most concerned about. Those are the issues you need to concentrate on. Make sure you address all the predictable “burning questions” as early as you can in your presentation, even if it means violating the sequence above.

Tips On Effective Pitching

How do you turn a pitch from a monolog to a sale? Make sure every point you make connects with your audience. Keep your text very, very short. Really. Please. Use charts and pictures if you can. And engage your prospect. Ask questions. “Do you think this market opportunity is interesting?” “Have you seen anyone else addressing this problem?” “Do you think CIOs would be interested in a solution like this?” You may get some tough responses, but you will know a lot more about what is going on in the investor’s mind, and you will be engaging them in your story—instead of letting them play with their Blackberries under the table.

Some additional tips to improve the effectiveness of your pitch:

  • Make sure that everyone in the room is introduced. Rarely do entrepreneurs ask the investors in the room to introduce themselves. While it is appropriate to be familiar with each investor’s bio (assuming it is on the web), it’s fair to ask something like, “What investments have you been looking at recently?” And if there are some other faces in the room, you should absolutely have them introduce themselves and provide a little background.

  • Don’t use a feel-good, visionary “mission statement” on your overview slide. Mission statements have also become a joke in the venture industry. It’s like saying, “Our projections are conservative.” Focus on making sure your statement of your company’s value proposition is crisp, clear, and unique.

  • Prepare good use cases. Sometimes, no matter how simple and clear the description of a product, what the investor really needs is a concrete example of how people will actually use it. In some cases there will be multiple different use cases. You may need to outline these to get your point across.

  • Drop names, early and often. If you really have some brand names involved in your company—as customers, as partners, as members of the team—don’t keep them a secret for the first nine slides; make sure the investor knows about them early in the presentation. Be prepared for the investor to contact every single name you drop—whether it’s a person or a company. If you are going to drop names, they had better be real.

  • Make sure you can tell the entire story in ten to fifteen minutes. Even if you have time, your total presentation should be no longer than twenty minutes. You want to have time to engage the investors and discuss their questions or concerns. If you think you have additional critical points that have to be made, prepare “pocket slides” that you can put up if the topic arises.

  • Do the math. Average entrepreneur pitch: thirty-eight slides. Average VC attention span/cranial capacity: ten slides.

  • Learn how to control the flow of the meeting, without seeming inflexible or anxious. Watch and listen. Body language and questions will tell you if you are okay deferring a point or if you need to address it immediately. If you let your audience take over the flow, you will probably wind up creating a confusing, incomplete impression of your company. But if you don’t address the “burning questions” early and effectively, the investors won’t hear anything else you say.

  • Don’t lie. You would think this goes without saying, but in their enthusiasm for their creations, entrepreneurs tend to slip across the line all too often. Please do not interpret our exhortation to “sell” as an endorsement of hype, exaggeration, misrepresentation, spin, or lying. The best salespeople are credible and trustworthy. It is more important that investors trust you than that they understand every nuance your business.

  • You don’t have to be “conservative,” but you do have to be realistic. Most entrepreneurs fail to be realistic about how long things take in the real world (versus the spreadsheet world). Whether it’s the time to complete product development, or the time to close the next ten sales, entrepreneurs are pathologically optimistic. As with your financials, find examples of comparable challenges addressed by other companies, and use that data in your model.

  • Don’t put so much text on a page that the investor has to read it. Everything should be short, content-rich bullets in a font large enough to read without squinting. The words are simply reinforcement of the points you are making. Pictures, graphs, and charts should be uncluttered and make clear, compelling points. If they have to be deconstructed and explained piece by piece, you will lose focus and momentum.

  • Don’t use your presentation stack as a standalone document. It is perfectly okay if it is not readable when you are not around. That’s the job of your executive summary or your business plan. If you are looking for a guide to writing an executive summary, you can find our version online: “The Art of the Executive Summary.”

A good pitch is rare because it is so hard to execute on everything else that has to be done to build a successful company. But the ability to pitch is a key indicator for investors—if the entrepreneur doesn’t know how to sell, how can he or she build a great company?


BASICS: dilution 稀释

精品文摘 No Comments »

前一个post用百分比,%,显示了创业者股份的稀释。这次用更实际的股份数来表示。

第一个问题:总共应该要多少股?这是很多创业者在成立公司是碰到的第一个实际问题。

我建议founders开始公司时,给自己发10,000,000股。这样,以后几次发行新股给投资者和员工后,在上市时,总股份会在两千万到四千万之间。上市的股价一般是每一股$12-$18(大家看看,是不是所有的中国NASDAQ上市公司的起始股价)。这样,公司的市值在3亿到7亿美金之间,是一般上市公司的起始价值。

当然,股份数量及股价都不重要,重要的公司价值(市场决定)和各个股东的百分比。如果一开始的股份数量不理想,多了可以2并1,少了可以1拆2。对公司价值和股东的百分比没有任何影响。但是,在给员工期权的时候,同样是总股份的0.5%,一个总股份是20,000,000股的公司说是100,000股;总股份是100,000股的公司说是500股。你觉得哪个好听?

第二个问题:new issue和secondary share的区别是什么?New issue是公司融资,发行新的股票。“卖家”是公司,买家是新的投资者,卖家(公司)以股票换现金。现金进公司。secondary share是现有股东出让股票,“卖家”是现有股东,买家是新的投资者,卖家(现有股东)以股票换现金,现金进入现有股东的腰包。行业里很多时候用“投资”这个词代表这两间完全不同的事。

我们这里谈的是new issue。用上一篇同样的例子:

Angel round:
一般天使投资者不会要创业者设立option pool,所以计算很简单。
Pre-money valuation: $1,500,000
Founder shares: 10,000,000
Per share: $1,500,000 / 10,000,000 = $0.15
Raise (融资): $200,000
New issue (新发股) for investors: $200,000 / $0.15 = 1,333,000
Total Shares: 11,333,000
Founder %: 10,000,000 / 11,333,000 = 88%

Series A round:
Pre-money valuation: $6,000,000
Per share: $6,000,000 / 11,333,000 = $0.53 错了! 没有考虑option pool。大多数VC都要创业者把option pool考虑在pre-money valuation里。怎么算?

Option pool一般是post-money valuation的10%到25%。算20%。
Raise: $3,000,000
Post-money valuation: $9,000,000
Option pool “value”: $9,000,000 * 20% = $1,800,000
“Real” pre-money valuation: $6,000,000 - $1,800,000 = $4,200,000
Per share: $4,200,000 / 11,333,000 = $0.37

New issue for investors: $3,000,000 / $0.37 = 8,095,000
Option pool: $1,800,000 / $0.37 = 4,857,000
Total Shares: 24,286,000
Founder %: 10,000,000 / 24,306,000 = 41%

细心的朋友,如果还记得我的上一篇的话,会发现我上一篇这里算出来的时39%。怎么回是?

我上一篇算错了!我已更新。看上去很简单的计算,因为有option pool,变得很容易搞错。我以后会专门写一篇option pool的大小和时间(Series A时小一点,Series B时在增加,会不会对创业者有好处?)对valuation的影响。

Series B round:
Pre-money valuation: $40,000,000
Per Share: $40,000,000 / 24,306,000 = $1.65
Raise: $10,000,000
New issue for investors: $10,000,000 / $1.65 = 6,052,000
Total shares: 24,306,000 + 6,052,000 = 30,358,000
Founder %: 10,000,000 / 30,358,000 = 33%

Series C round:
Pre-money valuation: $150,000,000
Per share: $150,000,000 / 30,358,000 = $4.94
Raise: $30,000,000
New issue for investors: $30,000,000 / $4.94 = 6,072,000
Total Shares: 30,358,000 + 6,072,000 = 36,430,000
Founder %: 10,000,000 / 36,430,000 = 27%

股份总数越来越多,而创始者的股份一直是10,000,000。留意:当初“20%”的option pool,现在只有4,857,000 / 36,430,000 = 13%。可能也发的差不多了。Series C投资者可能会要增加option pool,会进一步稀释创业者股份。

IPO:
Pre-money valuation: $400,000,000
Per share: $400,000,000 / 36,430,000 = $11.0
Raise: $100,000,000
New issue at IPO: $100,000,000 / $11.0 = 9,108,000 (这里假设IPO时,没有现有股东套现,卖secondary shares)
Total shares: 36,430,000 + 9,108,000 = 45,538,000
Founder %: 10,000,000 / 45,538,000 = 22%

一个创业公司的成长,就反映在股价的升值。升值越快,融资时稀释就越少。当然,越省钱,融资数额少,稀释也越少。一个$5,000的花费,公司初期相当于0.3%的股份(好心痛!),后期是0.01%都不到。

babytree的未来

精品文摘 No Comments »

王怀南在中国互联网的圈子里,因“谷歌之父”而闻名。其实,只是因为王怀南当时身处市场总监这个位置,大家就把谷歌和他紧密的联系在一起。本周5G白话过程中,王怀南也许是第一次披露,在他心里,认为“古歌”才是他的最爱。

话说回来,一个网站或公司的名字远远没有它提供的服务重要。甚至今天我们大家都趋之若鹜的Google,居然也是一个拼写错误的单词。根据《the google story》(中文版叫做撬动地球的Google)的介绍,未正式命名的Google当时还叫做BackRub。和page同一个办公室的肖恩安德森一手注册了Google.com这个域名,当时他们认为这个单词表示的是一个巨大的数字,相当于10的100次方。注册域名后,安德森兴致勃勃的把它写在白板上。第二天,同一个办公室的塔玛拉为他们留下了一个字条,正确的拼写应该是Googol!

GGYY这么多域名的典故,是因为当王怀南打算离开Google创建育儿网站的时候,我有幸和他进行了一次面对面的交流。其原因在于,我曾经一度打算干一件王怀南和邵亦波现在正在做的相同的事。王怀南当时问我对域名的看法,我告诉他我的初步想法有两个,一个是大眼睛,一个是快长大。也许,王怀南当时已经有了babytree的创意,所以他立马反应到,“快长大”这个想法来自那首著名的儿童歌谣:小松树、快长大… …

王怀南有着显赫的简历,不过他从没有作为创业者操盘一家StarUp公司。但是,我们那次见面后,从2007年1月到3月,在两个月的时间里,王怀南招兵买马,纠集Yahoo一拍的旧部,在3月8日正式推出了www.babytree.com。作为有一个两岁女儿的父亲,我也第一时间成为了babytree的注册用户。 

babytree把自己定义为一个育儿社区。主要功能包括:

1、宝宝树,就是一个以儿童成长日记、图片秀、许愿树为代表的Blog。
2、大圈子,就是一个以各种话题为线索的论坛社区。
3、小圈子,就是一个以地域、幼儿园为线索的小群组。

babytree上线以后,我把她和我心目中的育儿网站进行了比较。babytree现有的用户架构没有我当时设想的复杂,比如,她现在不能很好的支持双胞胎和多胎家庭,不能支持爸爸妈妈以各自的身份在社区中活动。但是,从易用性和功能性来说,应该还是一个很出色的网站。尤其是考虑到他们实际上只用了两个月的开发时间。

babytree现在最活跃的内容是宝宝树。让我没想到的是,尽管我家宝宝的账户是我注册的。但随后,我老婆对babytree更感兴趣。老婆在宝宝树里写下了很多日记,让我第一次感觉到,孩儿她妈的码字能力并不比我差。当然,更让人感到温馨的是,每天晚上临睡前,我通过宝宝树上妈妈留下的文字,知道了妈妈和宝宝今天是如何度过的。本来这是一个打算秀给外人看的功能,却恰恰成为一个家庭内部最温暖的空间。看过宝宝的照片和妈妈的文字,然后甜美的睡去,睡梦里仿佛都有女儿的微笑。

还有一个没想到是babytree上线后推出的第一个新功能–许愿树。我知道互联网上甚至存在单独实现许愿功能的网站,但作为一个没有任何信仰的糙老爷们儿,我对这个功能很是不屑。但老婆的行为又一次让我改变了看法,两天的时间里,她在许愿树里为宝宝留下了9个愿望。于是,许愿树又一次成为了联系这个家庭的纽带,除了每天必听老婆的唠唠叨叨,我居然可以有一个地方了解到这个和我生活了12年的大女孩的心愿和童心。

当然,抛开用户感受,作为所谓的互联网评论者,我也对babytree有着一贯的担心:商业模式啦、推广啦、烧钱啦、等等等等。不过,既然我错过了自己建一个育儿社区的好机会,我还是把这些烦恼和问题留给王怀南和他们的团队吧。babytree和我的小女儿一样,面对那么不可知的未来,她们都将开始一段探索未知世界的成长之路。每个人都希望自己的孩子茁壮成长,在王怀南的心目中,babytree应该也是他又一份对未来的寄托… …

我太爱那个网站/游戏了,但我很久没去玩了

精品文摘 No Comments »

This photo was orginally uploaded by OldhaMedia, on Flickr.

前几天推荐给心理速递一篇文章,描述了一个很怪的现象:

有一次,女友突然问我,你最喜欢做的事情是什么?我想了一想,说是滑冰。滑冰时的感觉太好了,清新而冰凉的空气,四周美好的景色…那你上次滑冰什么时候呢?女友又问。好像,是三年前?我答到。然后女友问了我一个当时难以回答的问题:这么说,三年来都做没做过自己最喜欢的事情,你生活得是不是不太wisely?

前两天,我推荐了一个消色块游戏:如此简单,如此着魔,太喜欢这个小巧的休闲游戏了,打发了我数个无聊时光。但是现在,我不敢把它放在我的Google个性化首页上,也不敢轻易的去首页。

半年前,我重新打开了Sogua网,一个音乐娱乐门户网站,WOW!我在上面找到了好多音乐剧,还有台湾相声瓦舍的冯翊纲和宋少卿的作品,太震撼了!新歌全部弄成了10首批量试听,我很轻松的点一下按钮,就开始了新鲜音乐旅程。

但我要很久才去一次Sogua。

同事说她特爱吃某条街上的生煎还有梅花糕,还有还有。。。但是,她有快两年没去过了。

W-H-Y?

你的网站,游戏,生煎还是滑冰场,做得再好,用户都很happy了,可是为什么,却不肯来呢?

Eric随后讨论到:阻止我们经常去做自己喜欢的事情,可能是因为这些事情背后都需经历一些不大令人愉快的体验,比如组织一场滑雪旅行就够人受的。他提出一个观点:我喜欢滑雪,但我真正喜欢的是,在天气晴朗雪地适宜,同时人又不多的情况下享受急速滑行。我不喜欢在缆车前排长龙,有时滑到半天我就精疲力竭已经谈不上享受了。因此我挺赞同Eric——虽然滑雪是让人享受的,但另一方面它也有令人不快的地方。不过,Eric和你也许会对另外一种观点感兴趣:

在《满意》一书中,Gregory Berns提到:再好的事情做多了也会腻。

Eric的观点可以打开一扇关于体验问题发现的窗户:

产品本身很优良,不管是视觉的,可用性的,稳定性,隐私保护,都做到了用户满意98%了。但是,但是,一个完整的用户体验,包括的不只是这些,还包括了接近产品的体验,离开产品的体验。

1。接近很困难,下载安装,超级费神。或者产品价格定得不合理,或者品牌形象不够契合,都直接影响到用户是否来,是否买单。一个例子:

很多人爱死了可口可乐,但是有一阵,可口可乐公司请了超女冠军某某来代言,她那男性化的酷造型出现了瓶子上以后,代理商纷纷要求退货。顾客看到瓶子上的人之后不买了。为什么啊?不喜欢瓶子上的画,就能直接影响到他是不是也放弃胃的喜好?对的,品牌里面包含了用户群对一种价值理念的认可。

2。离开产品的体验:

  • “我每次都感到离开很难,因为那游戏让我上瘾了”。。
  • “因为那个网站让我每次都忍不住耗费数个小时浏览,半天时间转眼就没了”。。“
  • 感觉到时光被扼杀的太严重”。。
  • “我不敢上网,我想学习查资料,可是网络太丰富了,仿佛掉进了一个知识海洋,怎么也游不出来,后来我就把宽带停掉了。。
  • 还有,“我本来很想买那个东西,打算回去考虑一下,但是没想到看到我要走,那人脸色就变了,开始拿上海话骂我,靠,偏就不买了!”

除了接近产品,离开产品的体验,个人使用产品的体验非常的好,但是,还是不够。因为不是你一个人在用产品,用户和用户之间会发生交互,多用户后,系统带来的体验。

“那个游戏很有趣,可是里面的人素质太差了!”

“喜欢滑雪,可是这么多人,只能在缆车前面排长龙。”

“内容是还不错,但是旁边的广告太色情了。”

Gregory Berns的玩多了会腻的观念就更容易理解一些。产品的初始体验再好,不等于一劳永逸。你需要提供新用户成长过程中需要的不断的刺激,玩点~不然,你的产品或许就会像QQ,等培养你成了聊手,你就转去用MSN了,因为那里提供了聊天新鲜感过后的聊天老手更需要的有节制的交流。

作者:油茶研究会

相关链接:

LinkedIn and the Art of Avoiding an Asshole Boss

精品文摘 No Comments »
LinkedIn_ Find References.jpg

Since blogging about Bob Sutton’s notorious book, The No Asshole Rule, I have received a constant flow of emails from readers sharing their own tales of lecherous bosses and indignities suffered.

Mean-spirited morons are still running much of the workplace, and it’s time to take a stand. Most nastiness is directed by superiors to subordinates; so before taking a job, do your homework and screen them out in advance. (After all, avoidance is the easier than curing.)

To do this, I propose that you check your prospective boss’s references just like she’s checking out yours. I’m not suggesting that you ask your prospective boss for a list of references (you can try, but it may mean you don’t get the job).

Instead, do a LinkedIn reference check. First, look her up to determine if you have any common connections. If so, find out more from people you trust. Second, use the LinkedIn reference check tool to find people who overlapped with her in the past.

The beauty of this tool is that she doesn’t even have to be a member of LinkedIn. You simply specify the company and years of employment for her, and LinkedIn will show you people in your network who worked at that company during the same time.

Once you’ve located folks to serve as a reference check, you need to know what to ask. This is where Badass Bob Sutton comes in. He prepared this list of questions for you.

  1. Kisses-up and kicks-down: “How does the prospective boss respond to feedback from people higher in rank and lower in rank?” “Can you provide examples from experience?” One characteristic of certified assholes is that they tend to demean those who are less powerful while brown-nosing their superiors.

  2. Can’t take it: “Does the prospective boss accept criticism or blame when the going gets tough?” Be wary of people who constantly dish out criticism but can’t take a healthy dose themselves.

  3. Short fuse: “In what situations have you seen the prospective boss lose his temper?” Sometimes anger is justified or even effective when used sparingly, but someone who “shoots-the-messenger” too often can breed a climate of fear in the workplace. Are co-workers scared of getting in an elevator with this person?

  4. Bad credit: “Which style best describes the prospective boss: gives out gratuitous credit, assigns credit where credit is due, or believes everyone should be their own champion?” This question opens the door to discuss whether or not someone tends to take a lot of credit while not recognizing the work of his or her team.

  5. Canker sore: “What do past collaborators say about working with the prospective boss?” Assholes usually have a history of infecting teams with nasty and dysfunctional conflict. The world seems willing to tolerate talented assholes, but that doesn’t mean you have to.

  6. Flamer: What kind of email sender is the prospective boss? Most assholes cannot contain themselves when it comes to email: flaming people, carbon-copying the world, blind carbon copying to cover his own buttocks. Email etiquette is a window into one’s soul.

  7. Downer: “What types of people find it difficult to work with the prospective boss? What type of people seem to work very well with the prospective boss?” Pay attention to responses that suggest “strong-willed” or “self-motivated” people tend to work best with the prospective boss because assholes tend to leave people around them feeling de-energized and deflated.

  8. Card shark: “Does the prospective boss share information for everyone’s benefit?” A tendency to hold cards close to one’s chest—i.e., a reluctance to share information—is a sign that this person treats co-workers as competitors who must be defeated so he or she can get ahead.

  9. Army of one: “Would people pick the prospective boss for their team?” Sometimes there is upside to having an asshole on your team, but that won’t matter if the coworkers refuse to work with that person. Use this question to help determine if the benefit of having the prospective boss on your team outweighs any asshole behaviors.

  10. Open architecture: “How would the prospective boss respond if a copy of The No Asshole Rule appeared on her desk?” Be careful if the answer is, “Duck!”


Delicious Joins The MyWare Camp

精品文摘 No Comments »

Longtime readers of this blog know how much I love to spy on myself. I use last.fm to record all of my music listens and I showcase them on this blog. I use the attentiontrust firefox extension to record my clickstream and search history and I used to showcase them in the root widget. You can now follow my clickstream as a channel in the attentron software.

I don’t do this just to be an exhibitionist. I find great value in keeping track of my online activities and looking back at them to understand what I find most valuable and interesting. I don’t use the internet or any other medium in some regular rote way. I don’t use a feedreader, I follow links. I move back and forth from iTunes, to last.fm, to the hypemachine, to rhapsody when I listen to music. I read the Times in paper form some days, oneline other days, and not at all many days. I read techmeme, then valleywag, then techcrunch, then om malik, then nothing, then everything.

But over time a pattern emerges. I have certain favorite blogs (this one being my favorite and I am serious about that). I have certain favorite musicians which you can see on my left sidebar. That list is not something I made up. It’s calculated by last.fm based on my listening history. I have favorite websites.

And that’s where delicious comes in. Delicious rolled out a new feature with the release of its new firefox extension. If you select the delicious toolbar as one of your view options in firefox, you will then get the option to show recently bookmarked URLs or most visited URLs. I selected most visited. Delicious is now tracking your web visits, and showing you (and only you) the most used websites on your toolbar, there to be clicked on. Awesome, awesome, awesome!!

I found Joshua on IM yesterday afternoon and chatted with him a bit about this. I told him that within a week the “most visited” toolbar looked a lot like my firefox bookmarks toolbar. “nod” was the reply. Typically cryptic response.

Firefox bookmarks are a manual representation of the sites I find most valuable. These are the ones I’ve taken the time to bookmark and put onto my toolbar. And I have put 40 URLs into my firefox bookmarks toolbar. 17 of them are visible on the toolbar, the others are in the dropdown box. I manage those 17 actively in an attempt to keep the most valuable sites in one click territory.

My most visited list from delicious contains 13 URLs right now. 9 of them are also right above on the visible firefox bookmarks toolbar. I bet that within another week or two, they will be identical.

Then what? Do I move the ones on the delicious most visited list into the dropdown box so in my firefox toolbar I have the next most popular list?

It seems to me that delicious and firefox could take the next step and make these two lists work together in some way. Allow me to mix manual bookmarking and implicit bookmarking and display the combined results in some way that’s most useful to me.

Anyway, I think this is a big step in the right direction for delicious. I once asked Joshua why he didn’t allow voting in delicious. He said that tagging was voting. A tag was a yes and anything else was a no. Well they just added a second vote in delicious. A click is also a yes. And a lot of clicks to a given URL is a big yes.

And I am glad to see it.

MySpace商业化的2007--商业周刊评论

精品文摘 No Comments »

原文作者:Steve Rosenbush
原文链接:What’s Next for MySpace
译者:雷声大雨点大

2006年新闻集团的默多克在互联网业的大手笔令人目眩(译者注:指收购MySpace等网站)。而他为2007设定的目标将更加引人注目。

去年夏天,75岁的媒体巨头默多克闯入互联网业。这位媒体王国--新闻集团的CEO进行了一系列的并购。而其中最引人注目的当属以5亿8千万美元收购互联网新宠――MySpace(参见商业周刊2005年7月19日的文章)。

但同时,他还授权了对IGN
6亿5千万的并购。这一并购同时包括了该公司的旗舰游戏网站以及电影评论网站“烂番茄”。另外还有些较小规模的收购,如体育网站Scout.com。默多克对互联网的雄心勃勃还清晰地体现在他设立了一个全新的实体――“福克斯互动媒体(Fox
Interactive Media,FIM)”。这个实体与巨人“福克斯娱乐(Fox
Entertainment)”在公司组织结构上是平起平坐的。(参见商业周刊2006年5月2日的文章

一年后的今天,有迹象表明“福克斯互动”作为独立的实体正在走上商业成功的轨道。预计FIM到2007年6月财年结束时的年收入将超过5亿美元。以新闻集团的标准这不算什么。新闻集团去年的收入是260亿美元。“但收入增长非常快”FIM的首席营收官(chief
revenue officer)Michael
Barrett说。“我们认为FIM最终会与传统概念中的互联网巨人如Yahoo,MSN,AOL,在营收能力上比肩。”

后面要做的还很多。MySpace是仅次于Yahoo的世界第二大网站。但Yahoo的年收入超过50亿美元,比FIM的10倍还要多。同时,起步于90年代,Yahoo已经领先了MySpace。但FIM的营收机器还刚刚进入预热阶段。2007年FIM将推出一系列新产品和新服务,对他们来说这将是关键的一年。其中最重要的举措之一将在几周后推出。2006年底,FIM将宣布一个重要的合作协议,将使得数以百万计的MySpace新用户通过手机使用MySpace。

“一到周内我们将宣布一个重要的移动合作伙伴。”Barrett说。他拒绝提供无线合作伙伴是谁。但熟悉这一合作的业内高层人士告诉商业周刊这个合作伙伴是Cingular――AT&T和南方贝尔(BellSouth)的合资公司。FIM拒绝进一步评论,Cingular的管理层也不置评论。(译者:本文发表于2006年12月,Cingular与MySpace于2006年12月18日宣布合作。)

MySpace用户目前已经可以通过定制一家小公司Helio提供的服务使用一个手机版的MySpace。Helio是Earthlink和SK
Telecom的合资公司。但Helio与无线领域的头羊Cingular比起来是微不足道的。与Cingular的合作将把无线社会化网络推向主流人群。使社会化网络成为无线交流技术,如短信和手机发送email之外的另一个重要应用。

虽然MySpace最令人瞩目,其他被收购的网站,如IGN对FIM的增长也相当重要。IGN的收购包括一项叫Direct2Drive的技术,该技术对新闻集团的互联网战略从整体上有重要影响。IGN曾经使用Direct2Drive作为其用户购买游戏的电子商务平台。FIM则把它扩展到福克斯其他部门和工作室(如Lionsgate和Starz)内容的销售。

FIM还和其他对通过Direct2Drive平台进行网络内容销售的娱乐制片公司进行了洽谈。“Direct2Drive的推销进展非常好。这是很合乎逻辑的延伸。”FIM高级副总裁、总经理Mickie
Rosen指出。他告诉我们FIM正在与其他制片公司谈合作通过Direct2Drive进行销售。但他拒绝说是哪些制片公司。了解这一谈判的资深业内人士告诉商业周刊包括Vivendi的环球制片公司,他们之间的谈判进行的最深入。另外与索尼和时代华纳的谈判也再进行之中。

MySpace也成为与福克斯竞争的其他制片公司推广产品的载体。据Pali Research分析师 Rich
Greenfield介绍,索尼目前利用MySpace的一个页面销售电视剧Seinfield新出版的DVD。这被他称为“又一个重量级媒体继续为MySpace引擎增长助燃的例子。同时证明了高质量、用户渴望的内容越来越多地成为MySpace的一部分。而不光是YouTube上那种用户制作的视频。”同时,FIM积累的互联网上的经验也被输出到新闻集团的其他部门。比如FIM协助福克斯娱乐的25个地方电视台推出了一系列网站。据商业周刊了解,FIM接下来会协助几百个福克斯电视网内的电视台推出网站。

“这些网站不仅仅是电视台的网络版,而是地方互联网门户”FIM高级副总裁、主管电视台业务的总经理Ron
Berryman向我们介绍。每个地方网站都有一个包括一名编辑专家和一名销售人员在内的小团队。

Berryman指出福克斯的互联网战略与其他全国性的媒体公司不同。福克斯的定位目标在于
地方广告市场。这些市场目前由地方报纸和互联网巨人(如Google)所垄断。福克斯的这些地方网站名如“我的福克斯――达拉斯”“我的福克斯――纽约”。福克斯为这些网站提供统一的网络平台和内容管理系统。

新闻集团去年进入互联网业似乎是个冒险的举动。很多人幸灾乐祸地预测这一举措的失败。一个完全被75岁的媒体大亨掌控的新闻集团怎么可能玩得转象MySpace这样的互联网社区呢?同时批评者认为5亿8千万的价码实在太高了。他们还预测,政治观点和商业感觉都趋于保守的默多克会使自由的MySpace社区一蹶不振。人们说MySpace的年轻用户是变化无常的,他们会弃MySpace而去,寻找下一个热点社区。

然而现在14个月过去了,这种悲观的预测并没有发生。当新闻集团宣布收购时MySpace有1千4百万用户,而今天有5千万用户。MySpace在美国继续稳定增长,同时积极地扩展到新的国际市场,如中国。(参见商业周刊2006年9月21日的文章

“排名前100的品牌中有80个在MySpace投放广告。这是推销中的”Barrett说。在MySpace进行网站推广的品牌包括音乐制作公司到消费品,如Jeep和宝洁。

除2007财年将获得5亿美元收入外,新闻集团不愿透露更多财务信息。但Barrett指出FIM的盈利率也在上升。另外,整个行业范围内,网络广告的价值也在上升,这对FIM也很有帮助。

而MySpace被收购加入一个更加庞大的企业后,对其财务能力也大有好处。收购前MySpace通过第三方广告网络销售广告。而现在大部分广告是通过公司内部的销售人员销售。这些销售人员有顶极广告投放客户的渠道;而这些客户对福克斯

娱乐等新闻集团旗下企业已经非常熟悉了。用Barrett的话来说“这样的广告销售有更高的盈利率。”

从更长远的角度来看,最大的挑战来自高级管理人员的流失。FIM的创始总裁Ross
Levinsohn2006年11月离职追求其他的机会去了。FIM目前由他的堂兄、福克斯娱乐的老人Peter
Levinsohn运营。(参见商业周刊2006年11月17日的文章

MySpace创始人Tom Anderson 和Chris DeWolfe(参见商业周刊2005年6月13日的文章)应该会至少再待一年,否则他们无法全部兑现收购给他们带来的好处。但目前还不清楚Anderson
和DeWolfe一年后是否还会留在MySpace。这很可能会与MySpace在2007年的发展有关。这两个人对MySpace快速成功和管理层的稳定都很关键。

另一个重大挑战与FIM的巨大用户群有关。至少到目前为止,FIM的营销活动和新产品推出并没有让用户背离MySpace。但这个过程只是个开始。比如MySpace目前允许用户通过网站出售他们的原创音乐,但网站可以更进一步地商业化,比如让用户进行音乐评论、销售T恤衫或其他消费品。

到目前为止,FIM被证明是默多克的明智之举。2006年11月他告诉投资者仅MySpace单独卖掉就可以值60亿美元。虽然这个数字可能比较偏高,分析家认为MySpace至少值20亿美元。对于仅仅一年的工作这可相当不错了。

添加评论

相关文章:

  MySpace 起步揭密(一)

  MySpace 起步揭密(二)

  开放MySpace的价值

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Login